"Far From The Madding Crowd": B-. It is always good to get the disclaimers out of the way.
Therefore, here is mine: I have not read the English classic novel by
Thomas Hardy, Far From The Madding Crowd, on which this film by
the same name is based. To the extent I have objections to the film
version, therefore, I am only holding script writer David Nicholls and
director Thomas Vinterberg partially at fault. Hardy, even though he
has been dead for eighty-seven years, must shoulder at least some of the
responsibility. The movie is beautifully filmed and, for the most
part, splendidly acted. Alas, it is also one of the most predictable
romantic tales I've seen in several months.
The
story centers around a young woman, Bathsheba Everdene (Carey
Mulligan), who is able to transition, thanks to the beneficence of a
deceased uncle, from a nondescript life on a farm in southwestern
England to becoming the proud and rich owner of a nearby estate.
Shortly before and just after she becomes aware of her good fortune, two
important events occur. First, she meets her ridiculously handsome
young neighbor, Gabriel Oak (Matthias Schoenaerts), who proposes to her
within minutes of their introduction. "I own one hundred acres and two
hundred sheep," he proclaims. When Bathsheba politely declines, stating
her position that she has no intention of ever marrying, he is
momentarily surprised at her rejection and then shrugs it off, bidding
her farewell as he returns on foot to tender to his flock.
The
second important event is the most memorable scene in the film.
Allowing you to witness it without a detailed introduction is the best
course here. Suffice it to say that, as a result of that second event,
the bright future of Gabriel is placed in jeopardy -- a reversal of
fortune, you might call it. Shortly thereafter, Bathsheba, partially
out of a sense of pity, hires him as a shepherd on her magnificent ranch.
Bathsheba
is no shrinking violet. Within days of assuming ownership of the
ranch, she warns her staff not to assume that her gender will lead to a
laissez faire style of management. She is setting the bar high, and in
fact terminates one of her top assistants on the spot for dereliction of
duty. Bathsheba does not delegate all the hard labor, as
evidenced by her working in the fields and stepping right in to the
filthy trough where the sheep are washed. She's frequently seen with
dirt smudges on her cheeks. She may be a diminutive female, but her
reputation as being a worthy rancher spreads throughout the region.
This
news piques the interest of William Boldwood (Michael Sheen), a wealthy
and older land baron who is curious enough to make a personal visit to
Bathsheba. Just as was the case with Gabriel, he too pops the question
to a startled, but not quite flustered, Bathsheba. While Gabriel was
more reserved -- in fact, unemotional -- about wanting Bathsheba,
Boldwood articulately reveals to her what he hopes a future together
might bring.
Enter yet a third male suitor,
army sergeant Francis Troy, sporting the worst looking mustache I've
seen since Bret Saberhagen toed the rubber for the Kansas City Royals in
the mid-eighties. The character of Troy, and the casting of Tom
Sturridge to play the part, are two huge weaknesses of the movie.
Almost nothing that occurs between Troy and Bathsheba is believable.
The worst example is a short scene in the woods where Troy, in full
dress military attire, practices Zorro-like moves with his military
sword above and around the stationary Bathsheba. (And here we thought
she was a smart woman!)
So there you have it,
the core cast. I guess we are supposed to feel suspense over which male
Bathsheba will ultimately end up with: the humble, honest and
hard-working ranch hand; the older guy who means well but for whom love
is not a two-way street (cue the Moments' 1970 hit, Love On A Two-Way Street!);
or, the soldier who resembles Snidely Whiplash and acts even worse. In
my view, once those three possibilities were established it was a
no-brainer as to who would be the lucky fella. I might have lost
interest at that point, save for the fact that I happened to notice that
Carey Mulligan has the cutest nose, strongly resembling that of my
beautiful granddaughter, Rose Marie. I entertained myself by guessing
from time to time how long it would take director Vinterberg to shoot
the next profile of his lead actress. Usually I did not have to wait
more than a few minutes; Vinterberg must admire Mulligan's nose too.
Getting
back to my disclaimer, unless a movie is a biopic or documentary, my
contention is that a filmmaker should not feel constrained to stay
faithful to the original written material in adopting the story for the
screen. In fact, one could make the argument that he is required to
deviate a little here and there for entertainment and commercial
purposes. Gabriel should be at least slightly imperfect, and Troy
should be much less of a cad. Regardless of how Hardy created those
characters in his book, those are refinements I would have strongly
suggested to Messrs. Nicholls and Vinterberg, if only they'd asked.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment